Appointment of judges: Delay in Justice K M Joseph’s elevation to SC leads to a political slugfest

The elevation of one of the two jurists recommended by the collegium as Supreme Court judges, today evoked sharp reaction with the apex court’s bar association chief terming as “disturbing” the government’s action of accepting only one name and asking it to reconsider the name of Justice KM Joseph.

SCBA president Vikas Singh, speaking in his individual capacity, expressed concern over the delay in the appointment of Justice Joseph and said "this kind of interference by the executive is definitely uncalled for". “This elevation is very wrong as it disturbs the seniority in the Supreme Court. We have seen in recent past how important seniority is in the apex court. Judges are being labelled as junior judges and said that they were not fit to hear sensitive matters. So tomorrow if somebody says Justice Joseph is a junior judge and not fit to hear a particular matter, it will be very sad," he said.

“Government will be responsible. This kind of interference by the executive is definitely uncalled for. By delaying this, they have definitely interfered in seniority rules and in that sense they have interfered in the functioning of judiciary. A very serious matter. The civil society and the judges of the Supreme Court in full court should discuss and take it up with the government,” Singh told PTI .

Activist lawyer Prashant Bhushan shared the views of senior advocate Vikas Singh, the Supreme Court Bar Association President. He was vocal in criticising the Centre and alleged that the government was trying to erode and destroy the independence of judiciary by not appointing those recommended by the collegium. “Justice KM Joseph’s instance is a very clear one, whose name has been stalled, which was recommended by the collegium four months ago. The name was unanimously recommended by the collegium and yet it has been stalled by the government because he gave a judgment in Uttarakhand case against the government. It is very shameful and shocking for a government which talks about the independence of judiciary to try and erode the independence of judiciary by sitting on appointment of people that it doesn’t like,” he said.

Congress blasts Centre

The Congress accused Prime Minister Narendra Modi of indulging in “revenge politics” by “refusing” to clear the elevation of the country’s most senior chief justice, K M Joseph, to the Supreme Court. “Is the Modi government above the law,” former finance minister P Chidambaram tweeted. “What is holding up Justice K M Joseph’s appointment? His state, or his religion or his judgement in the Uttarakhand case?,” he asked.

In 2016, a bench headed by Uttarakhand High Court Chief Justice KM Joseph quashed the imposition of President rule in the state and had revived the Congress government headed by Harish Rawat. Later, the Congress lost the Assembly election. This was seen as  a major setback to Modi government.

In a series of tweets, Congress' communications in-charge Randeep Surjewala alleged that the judiciary is under the "most vicious attack ever”. "PM Modi’s ‘revenge politics’ qua judiciary and ‘conspiratorial suffocation’ of Supreme Court exposed again,” Surjewala said in a tweet, adding that Justice Joseph, who heads the Uttarakhand High Court, is India’s most senior chief justice. “Yet Modi Government refuses to clear his elevation to SC as retribution for quashing presidential rule in Uttarakhand?,” he said.

Modiji shredded Parliamentary privileges and supremacy. He road-rolled independent media. Democracy’s last refuge i.e. Judiciary is now under most vicious attack ever. If the Nation doesn’t rise in unison now, totalitarianism will stump democracy, Surjewala tweeted.

Another senior Congress leader, Abhishek Manu Singhvi condemned the blocking of Justice Joseph to the Supreme Court. In a tweet, he said that the SC collegium “must issue notice of contempt” to the government officials. He also said that they must “refuse other appointments till Joseph J cleared”.

Senior BJP leader Subramanian Swamy said, on the issue of delay in Justice Joseph’s appointment, that the Congress party is just frustrated. “On one hand, they accuse the CJI being inclined to BJP and on the other, they are saying we have ignored him. The Congress party is just frustrated,” he said.

'Disregarded seniority'

The reactions of Chidambaram and others came amidst reports that the government had cleared the appointment of senior advocate Indu Malhotra as a judge of the Supreme Court, but not that of Justice Joseph. Malhotra will be the first woman judge to be appointed to the top post directly from the bar. Meanwhile, the law ministry sources said the government has asked the collegium to reconsider the recommendation to elevate Justice Joseph as a judge of the top court.

On January 22, the apex court collegium’s file recommending the elevation of Justice Joseph and Malhotra reached the Law Ministry. After processing the file in the first week of February, the recommendations were kept in abeyance as the government wanted to elevate only Malhotra. But now, the government has gone ahead with the appointment of Malhotra and asked the collegium to reconsider the elevation of Justice Joseph.

The government feels that while recommending the name of Justice Joseph, the collegium has disregarded seniority and regional representation. He is 42nd in the seniority list of 669 high court judges.

COMMENT NOW