Despite the many efforts, SEBI has not been able to ensure that all independent directors act without the influence of promoters to protect the interest of small shareholders, rued Ajay Tyagi, Chairman, Securities and Exchange Board of India.
“I must admit that notwithstanding various efforts, we are yet to get ideal solutions to issues such as ensuring independence of independent directors, selecting the best suited persons as independent directors, making their role more effective and meaningful, etc.,” Tyagi said at a virtual summit organised on Tuesday by the Confederation of Indian Industry on Corporate Governance in India.
In Tyagi’s view, despite SEBI’s best efforts, the ones who are genuinely not independent will never be. “It is true that human behaviour cannot be regulated by norms. However, it is our endeavour through improved processes and disclosures, to bring in greater balance, transparency and quality in the selection of independent directors and functioning of corporate boards,” Tyagi said.Recently, SEBI put out a discussion paper to make the role of independent directors more transparent. It suggested the appointment of an independent director such that retail shareholders are not subjected to unfair risks and no management/board-level decision dents the public’s trust.
Dual role
Tyagi also highlighted the need to separate the functions of the chairman and the managing director in a company. A large number of listed companies have the same person in both roles.
“Separation of the roles will reduce excessive concentration of authority in a single individual. The underlying idea for such a separation is not to weaken the position of the promoter, but to improve corporate governance,” Tyagi said
SEBI recently extended the deadline for the separation of the roles of chairman and MD to April 2022 for the top 500 listed companies. As of December 2020, only 53 per cent of these companies had complied with the SEBI norm.
Tyagi said globally, too, companies were moving to separate the roles of chairperson and MD/CEO.
“In the UK and Australia, the debate has tilted in favour of separating the two posts. Germany and the Netherlands have a two-tier board structure, separating the roles of board and management. The OECD also recommends that the two posts be separated as a good governance practice,” Tyagi said.
Comments
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of TheHindu Businessline and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.