The ideal Goods and Services Tax (GST) rate should be around 18 per cent, Naushad Forbes, President, Confederation of Indian Industry (CII), said here on Tuesday.

Calling it a “revenue neutral rate”, the industry body President pointed out that an 18 per cent rate will lead to “neither an increase nor a decrease” in taxes; immediate inflationary pressures on the economy are also not forseen (at that rate).

The rate would also be right in the sense that it was not “so high to damage the market” (for demand of goods).

Considered to be the country’s biggest-ever indirect tax reform, the GST framework has already been passed by Parliament.

“A max rate of around 18 per cent would be fine. Beyond that, the first thing it will hit is demand. Supposing you had 22-23 per cent, it will directly hit demand. If you suddenly end up paying 5 -8 (percentage point) more, then the immediate effect is you consume less,” Forbes reasoned.

According to the CII President, in the long-run a revenue neutral rate of GST will help bring in buoyancy and lead to widening of the tax net and increased collections.

Implementation of GST

Forbes pointed out that apart from the rate, the next most important step will be to ensure seamless implementation of GST. This requires clarity on several aspects as well as aligning the various IT and other tax assessment/collection mechanisms of Centre, states and companies together.

“The states passing the GST will not be an issue. But, seeing that the state government and Central government systems are in place; and the company IT systems should also be in place for all this tracking to take place and doing it all in a national unified way,” he told reporters during an interaction.

For smooth working of GST regime, Forbes said, it has to be ensured that states are on the same page at least in terms of systems and procedures. For example, there should be a common GST form and not different ones across states.

“A common tax is okay. But you (states) can't have your own form. If you have that, then there will be 29 different forms in 29 different states. That defeats the whole purpose. We don’t care, in which format. But there should be one form. That’s the goal,” he reiterated.

The CII President, also pointed out that clarifications regarding “deemed export sops” are awaited. “Some of the export sops people are talking about are not exactly export sops, but rather deemed export sops. But I think they are working out in detail. The rules are still not clear,” Forbes said.

Related Topics