Credit rating agency Crisil has downgraded more companies as against the number of upgrades for the second consecutive year due to demand slowdown and low credit availability.
Crisil’s credit ratio — or the proportion of upgrades to downgrades — for the first half of the current fiscal ended September 30 was at 0.87 times. The ratio has stayed under 1 for the last two years. This time around, there were 478 downgrades to 417 upgrades. As much as 86 per cent of the downgrades were due to demand slowdown and stretch in liquidity (caused by delays in receivables),” Crisil said in a statement.
Crisil believes these problems, along with high interest rates, mean the credit quality of corporates will remain weak in the near term.
Crisil’s analysis on 2,481 firms rated BBB- and above indicates that one-fourth of these firms were highly vulnerable to demand slowdown and a sixth to liquidity constraints.
“Working capital management emerged as a clear differentiator of credit quality. Firms with longer working capital cycles — or gross current assets (GCA) exceeding 240 days of sales — have witnessed twice the number of downgrades compared with upgrades,” highlighted Ramraj Pai, President, Crisil Ratings.
“On the other hand, firms with prudent working capital management, as indicated by low GCAs of less than 120 days of sales, witnessed more upgrades than downgrades,” he added. The power, road transport and construction sectors had the highest downgrade rates.
Pai also said: “Despite the tough economic environment, we continue to see rating upgrades. Almost 40 per cent of the upgrades were driven by firm-specific factors such as a satisfactory track record of timely debt servicing by firms that were previously rated default grade, and an improvement in capital structure following higher-than-anticipated equity infusions or reduction in debt,” he said. “Another 25 per cent,” he said, “was due to better business conditions for firms that are not dependent on investment demand such as textiles, agricultural products and packaged foods sectors. These sectors witnessed the highest upgrade rates.”
Weak asset quality of banks
Further, the asset quality of banks would reflect the weakness in the external environment.
Pawan Agrawal, Senior Director, Crisil Ratings: “We expect the gross non-performing assets (NPAs) to increase sharply by 110 basis points to 4.4 per cent of gross advances by the end of this fiscal, up sharply from 3.3 per cent last year. Furthermore, systemic weak assets are likely to rise by 140 basis points to 5.7 per cent of gross advances by the end of this fiscal, a significant increase over last year’s 4.3 per cent.”
Weak assets are defined as gross non-performing assets (NPAs) plus 30 per cent of restructured standard assets (RSAs), excluding those of State power utilities. Crisil believes 30 per cent of RSAs have a high chance of slipping into NPAs over the next two years on account of the L-shaped economic growth trajectory expected.
Going forward, the demand and adequacy of funding will drive the credit quality of companies. Crisil believes downgrades will continue to outnumber upgrades over the near term, and the intensity of downgrades may even increase.