The Prime Minister's Office (PMO) today said in a brief statement that it had not taken any decision to allocate ‘space segment' (wireless radio frequency under the control of the Department of Space) in the S-Band Spectrum to Antrix Corporation or Devas Multimedia Pvt Ltd.
The statement claimed that the question of any revenue loss did not arise; reports to that effect are without basis, in fact.
The PMO was responding to reports that appeared in
The reports had contended that the agreement for the lease of transponder capacity for roughly equivalent to Rs 500 crore, a sum that was grossly short of what the initial estimates from the audit carried out by the Office of the Comptroller and Auditor General suggested that it could fetch.
The recently concluded 3G auction of radio frequencies available with the Department of Telecommunication offered a clear benchmark in this regard.
Contract specifics
But an analysis of the Antrix-Devas agreement throws up pointers that are at variance with the contention of the PMO.
According to the terms of contract made in January 2005, Antrix represented that it has the power to enter into and perform this Agreement (the agreement to deliver space segment communication capacity).
The contract was to deliver to Devas a leased capacity on the primary satellite five transponders of 8.1 MHz each and another five transponders of 2.7 MHz capacity within a period of 36 months (including a grace time of six months).
In satellite communications, the grant of transponder is tantamount to allocation of spectrum, as they are designed to work at specific frequency bands. In this case as and when the transponders are allotted in the S-Band, it follows that spectrum in the 2500 MHz band would be allotted.
This is somewhat akin to the way DTH operators are given transponders for broadcasting. When a Tata Sky, Dish TV or other DTH operator is offered transponders, it is essentially offered frequency in the Ku band — a different set of radio frequencies.
Termination clause
The Government has also contended that there is no revenue loss from the legal arrangement between the commercial arm of ISRO and the private company. The extent of revenue foregone may be open to interpretation.
However, for the Government to contend that there is no financial loss whatsoever is clearly at variance with the financial penalties that Antrix is liable to pay out and hence, by extension, the Government for any default in the timely delivery of the promised transponder capacities.