The Supreme Court on Wednesday put a poser as to why there was no objection from lawmakers on the government’s decision to make Aadhaar mandatory for making PAN cards, a move which was given effect by the latest Budget from July 1.
“542 persons are sitting in Parliament, why do they not object to it? If they are not objecting on it, why should we go into it,” a Bench comprising Justices A K Sikri and Ashok Bhushan said.
When it was told that the Centre has earlier made a statement in the apex court that they would not make Aadhaar mandatory, the Bench said, “they cannot be bound by it. It cannot preclude Parliament from enacting a statutory provision.”
The apex court was hearing three petitions challenging the constitutional validity of section 139AA of the Income Tax (IT) Act.
The top court said there was no doubt that Aadhaar should be voluntary and observed that since tax evasion existed, the government could bring in new statute to stop such “leakage”.
Comments
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of TheHindu Businessline and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.