The next meeting of climate negotiators will begin November 11 in Baku, the capital of Azerbaijan. Called COP29 (29th Conference of Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change), is slated to end on November 22 with an agreement on a new finance target to help developing countries cope with the deleterious effects of global warming, which is caused by emissions of greenhouse gases such as carbon dioxide. 

Typically, each COP meeting has a leading theme; COP29’s leading theme is ‘new collective quantified goal’, or NCQG – a term that will be heard a lot over the next couple of weeks. For this reason, COP29 is described as a ‘Finance COP’. 

The NCQG is a new target for funding that should be made available to developing countries. It will replace the ‘$ 100 b per year’ target that was set in 2009—the target was to be met by 2020, but never was.

The hope against hope is that an NCQG target will be agreed upon and there will be pledges for seed funding it. The points on the negotiators’ table include the structure of the goal and the quantum, who contributes to it, who should be given priority to receive funding out of it and sectoral targets such as for ‘adaptation’ and ‘loss and damage’. 

A point to note is, while developing countries wish to have more grant funds that they don’t have to repay, developed countries think of ‘funding’ as mobilising finance, even if at a concessional rate of interest. Even with the developed countries’ liberal definition of funding, the achievement is short of the target, which in turn is woefully short of the requirement, which runs into trillions of dollars. 

Another issue at COP29—again finance-related—to put money into the ‘loss and damage fund’. ‘Loss and damage’ refers to a country getting back on its feet after being hit by a climate event and is particularly relevant to lower income countries. Developed countries generally aim their efforts towards ‘mitigation’, or preventing further global warming (by measures such as renewable energy), and ‘adaptation’, which is taking steps to cope up with climate events that are no longer avoidable (such as by building storm water drains). A ‘Loss and damage’ fund was agreed upon in the Paris conference (COP21) in 2015, but was put on the backburner, and not taken up until COP27 in Egypt that a decision was taken to create a fund.  

It took a year more to actually set up the fund, which was formally named Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage (FRLD) and hosted by the World Bank. In COP28 at Dubai last year, about $700 m was pledged by a bunch of countries, against an estimated requirement of $ 580 billion. One might expect negotiations to veer around getting more money into the FRLD. 

COP29 will also discuss carbon markets, which constitute the ‘market mechanism’ of providing finance for climate action. Today carbon credit trading happens voluntarily. For example, Google or Apple may buy carbon credits from an agro-forestry project in India, to meet its own emission reduction targets. But how governments could use the carbon markets to meet their countries’ international commitments depends upon an agreed framework of rules and procedures. At the heart of this is ‘Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism’. The UNFCCC describes the mechanism like this: “Through this mechanism a company in one country can reduce emissions in that country and have those reductions credited, so that it can sell them to another company in another country. That second company may use them for complying with its own emission reduction obligations or to help it meet net-zero targets.”  

The Paris Agreement Credit Mechanism is something that will be negotiated upon at COP29. It involves issues like creating registries, authorization, credit transfers. 

Another point at COP29 is ‘Biennial Transparency Reports’ (BTR), agreed upon at the Paris conference. The first submission is due by December 31, 2024. Under the Enhanced Transparency Framework, countries are to submit BTRs every two years, in which they will provide information on progress against their own promises for climate action (called Nationally Determined Contributions, or NDCs,) policies and measures, climate change impacts and adaptation, levels of financial, technology development and transfer and capacity-building support, capacity-building needs and areas of improvement. 

Finally, countries will discuss NDCs. It was agreed at Paris that every five years, countries would come up with improved promises. The next submission is due in February 2025. This is crucial because the current promises are way short of the requirement to limit global warming to (a manageable) 2 degrees C, leave alone the safe 1.5 degrees C. Today’s NDCs, even if fully implemented (which is asking a lot) will take global warming to 2.6 - 2.8 degrees C. 

A non-exhaustive list of issues before COP29
New Collective Quantified Goal (NCQG): A new target for providing funding to developing countries, replacing the ‘$ 100 b per year’ agreed upon in 2009
Loss and Damage: Putting money into the ‘Fund for Responding to Loss and Damage’ (FRLD), to help (mainly) low income countries to get back on their feet if they are hit by a climate event, like a hurricane.
Carbon market (Article 6 of Paris Agreement): Agreeing on the finer points of the Paris Agreement Crediting Mechanism, which will then let countries buy and sell carbon credit, thus ensuring a ‘market mechanism’ for fund transfers to climate action projects
Biennial Transparency Reports: Reporting by each country disclosing the results of its climate actions in a prescribed format. The first BTR is due by December 31, 2024, but there will be discussions around it.
Enhancing Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs): Each country is expected to come up with promise for more action (or NDCs). The deadline for the next updated NDCs is February 2025, but NDCs are sure to figure in the negotiations