WHO public health programme at risk due to limited donors: experts

P. T. Jyothi Datta Updated - January 17, 2014 at 09:51 PM.

An international public-health programme run by the World Health Organsaition is at risk, reliant as it is, on just two international organisations for funding, say a group of former WHO directors and academics.

“For 12 years, the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Prequalification Programme (PQP) has helped to stem the tide of diseases such as HIV, TB, and malaria,” they say, pointing out the need for more sustainable funding.

Every year, billions of US dollars’ worth of medicines are purchased by or through international procurement agencies and non-government organsaitions, such as UNICEF, UNITAID, The Global Fund, Médecins Sans Frontières and governments, for use in developing countries. The WHO PQP helps ensure that these medicines meet acceptable standards of quality, safety and efficacy.

In fact, several India-based generic companies, including Cipla and Ranbaxy to name just a couple, feature on WHO’s pre-qualified list – giving countries a ready reckoner of companies from whom they can source quality, generic drugs (not covered by patent protection), and at affordable prices.

“We have found that this programme is effective, and saves money both directly and indirectly. Every dollar invested in the programme saves $170 in public medicine procurement. But 80-90% of the organisation’s funding comes from just two organisations – UNITAID and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF),” says Ellen ‘t Hoen, author and former policy and advocacy director of international humanitarian organsaition, Médecins sans Frontières (Doctors without Borders).

“UNITAID and BMGF have long recognized the value and impact of WHO medicines prequalification. Without their support many people would not be alive today. But it is time for governments and other donors to step up. We need a consortium of public and private global health donors to create a sustainable funding model and ensure that the medicines we distribute in developing countries work,” she added.

A study on this by four of these public health experts has been to be published in the Journal of Public Health Policy on Thursday, underlining the need for sustainable funding in the fight against global public health threats.

In 2000, only one in a thousand people living with HIV in Africa had access to treatment. Since then, the WHO PQP has prequalified over 200 products for treatment of HIV/AIDs. Now, of 8 million people globally receiving treatment for HIV, 6.5 million (81%) are receiving antiretrovirals of assured quality, they observed.

Initially the programme focussed on providing low-cost generic versions of medicines to treat HIV, TB, and malaria, but it has evolved and expanded due to increasing demand, and now covers -- essential medicines for reproductive health, diarrhoea, and neglected tropical diseases; quality control laboratories; active pharmaceutical ingredients; review of clinical research used to prove that generic medicines are as good as the branded versions and capacity of medicines regulators and pharmaceutical manufacturers in developing countries of Africa and Asia.

>jyothi.datta@thehindu.co.in

Published on January 17, 2014 07:54