The hearing on Tarun Tejpal’s anticipatory bail petition today resumed in a District and Sessions court here.
Tejpal’s lawyer Geeta Luthra continued her arguments before judge Anuja Prabhudesai, who had yesterday given the Tehelka former Editor interim protection till this morning against arrest in the case of alleged sexual assault on a woman journalist in the magazine.
The public prosecutor will later submit the arguments.
Ahead of hearing on his bail petition, Tejpal visited the Crime Branch office here this morning and said that he was cooperating in the investigation.
Police sources said that Tejpal was not quizzed, but he stayed for 10 minutes.
“We have joined the investigation started by the Crime Branch yesterday. We will join today also,” Tejpal told reporters after coming out of the office.
Tejpal had yesterday appeared before the Crime Branch after dodging a combined team of Goa and Delhi police that visited his house in Delhi at the crack of dawn to arrest him.
During arguments yesterday, Luthra had contended that Tejpal was a man of high integrity and reputation and that the CCTV footage of the hotel will exonerate him.
The complainant, who was seen normal even after the alleged incident, came with her complaint 10 days after the said episode, she had argued.
Arguing in the court today, Luthra said that Tejpal was ready to stay in Goa till the time it was required by the investigating agency.
She said that he will also not visit Mumbai, where the complainant currently resides.
“There should not be any fear that he (Tejpal) will tamper with witnesses or evidence,” the defence lawyer said.
Luthra also ruled out the possibility of Tejpal fleeing the country saying he has not fled before the FIR or after that.
“My client cannot tamper with the aggrieved girl as she will stand by her statement,” the lawyer said.
Wrapping up her arguments, Luthra said false allegation of rape can bring distress to the accused and cause equal damage to him as to the complainant.
She said as the rape law has become more stringent, so it is all the more required for the accused to defend himself for which “his liberty may be preserved“.
Public Prosecutor Saresh Lotlikar argued that prima facie a case is established against Tejpal and so the police want his custodial interrogation.
“The accused has been changing colours like a chameleon through different statements,” he said.
He noted that the complainant has been consistent in her statements.
Lotlikar said that the CCTV footage of the hotel in Goa, where the incident occurred early this month, gives enough hints confirming the allegation of rape.
The public prosecutor also argued that Tejpal was not avilable yesterday and appeared only after getting interim relief from the court.
He argued that the accused should be in police custody so that he can be properly interrogated.
He said Tejpal has been changing his version and is now saying that he has not been heard.
The public prosecutor alleged that Tejpal has in the past tried to influence the family of the complainant and refrred to an FIR filed in Delhi in this regard. That the accused is interfering in the investigation is well corroborated by his past conduct, he added.