Comments
In a massive blow to thousands of farmers in poll-bound Punjab, the Supreme Court on Thursday held a 2004 law, passed by the State Assembly, to return over 4,000 acres of land acquired for the Sutlej-Yamuna Link (SYL) canal, constitutionally invalid.
In a decision which may cause political ripples within Punjab and see a rise in border tensions with neighbouring Haryana, a five-member Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court led by Justice Anil R Dave has effectively said the land will not be returned to the Punjab farmers and will be retained for SYL canal, which is at the centre of a water-sharing dispute with Haryana. The Bench pronounced the judgment on a Presidential Reference on the validity of the Punjab Termination of Agreements Act, under which Punjab had sought to ease out of its liability to share the waters of Ravi, Beas and Sutlej.
“We have replied to all the questions (in the Reference) in the negative,” the Bench pronounced.
Haryana had revived the long-pending Reference after the Punjab Cabinet gave the green signal for tabling the Punjab Sutlej Yamuna Link Canal (Rehabilitation and Re-vesting of Proprietary Rights) Bill, 2016, in the State Assembly. It provided for the return of over 5,000 acres of land acquired from farmers for the canal.
Haryana had argued that Punjab cannot “successively legislate” away the Supreme Court’s role as the primary protector of the Constitution and the court’s duty to strike a balance between the interests of both the States.
Haryana had argued in court that while the 2004 Act was intended to defeat two Supreme Court judgments ordering Punjab to construct the canal on its territory, the new Bill was aimed at rendering the current Reference infructuous. Haryana had argued that “it is the duty of this Court to maintain the integrity of the federal structure” to stop Punjab. “You have to strike a balance between the States, large and small, powerful and weak, upstream or downstream. If you allow them to trump over your jurisdiction by successively legislating away, your powers, considered a linchpin in the Constitution, will lie denuded,” senior advocate Shyam Diwan for Haryana had argued.
Comments
Comments
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of TheHindu Businessline and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.