The maritime accident on March 26 in which the container vessel Dali collided with and brought down Baltimore’s Francis Scott Key Bridge could see the resurrection of an obscure 1851 maritime law on limited liability, coupled with the General Average declaration, to limit the claims by cargo owners and others on the liner and its owners. The law was first invoked by the owner of the Titanic after it sank in 1912, to limit its liability exposure.
Dali was bound for Colombo, and onward to Yantian, China. It held 4,679 containers, including many transit boxes for India.
The ship’s owners, Singapore-based Grace Ocean Private Ltd, have issued the General Average — general loss — declaration as the salvage cost is expected to be huge. This means the owners of the cargo will have to bear the cost of the cargo to cover some of the salvage costs. The General Average declaration was introduced in the York Antwerp rules of 1890. reviewed subsequently, and amended recently in 1994.
Pitching in
Maersk’s partner MSC said in a statement that it was unclear when and where the vessel may be berthed and discharged, but the General Average declaration signalled that the owners foresee an expensive salvage operation and expect all salvaged parties to pitch in.
Richards Hogg Lindley (RHL), London, which has been appointed as General Average adjuster, notified its intention to keep all containers under its control until security arrangements are made with the average adjusters, both for General Average and salvage.
Meanwhile, Grace Ocean (owner) and Synergy Marine Pte Ltd (manager of the ship) have filed a petition in the US District Court of Maryland Northern Division for exoneration from or limitation of liability..
General Average is declared by a vessel owner when there is extraordinary peril to the vessel, necessitating jettisoning some cargo. The losses suffered by the merchant is made good by the owners of the cargo that is delivered safely. A general marine insurance covers this peril, said J Krishnan of Chennai-based S Natesa Iyer Logistics LLP, a freight forwarder.
Inadequate insurance
Freight forwarders issue their house bill of lading (BL) to individual shippers but obtain a liner master BL recognising them as consignor even though they do not have the title to the goods. Freight forwarders need liability insurance to cover such claims. Unfortunately, many Indian freight forwarders avoid this to keep their operating cost low, he said.
If the shipment is on CIP (carriage and insurance paid to), CPT (carriage paid to) and FCA (free carrier) arrangement, the risk is on the buyer after loading; although trade is also conducted on CIF (cost, insurance and freight); CFR (cost and freight); and FOB (free on board) arrangements, which are better suited for bulk trades.
In the case of the Baltimore incident, the buyer would have an exposure to contribute to General Average/ salvage, said M Jagannath, a Singapore-based arbitrator, mediator and claims adjuster. “I would assume that cargoes would generally be insured to and from the American market,” he told businessline.
The Dali mishap occurred when the liner was sailing out of Baltimore. If the Indian buyers of cargo loaded in Dali are uninsured (say, shipment is on CPT or FCA), then they would have to contribute to the General Average, he said.
“It is important that parties review the risks involved in their trade and take appropriate insurance cover to deal with their exposures. Otherwise, they may face a rude surprise whenever something like the Dali incident at Baltimore or the Ever Given grounding at Suez Canal occurs,” he added.