In escalating tussle between the Parliament and Judiciary in Sri Lanka, the country’s apex court in a ruling on Thursday held as unconstitutional the impeachment of the nation’s first woman chief justice.
The Supreme Court here ruled that a parliamentary select committee (PSC), which probed the impeachment charges against Chief Justice Shirani Bandaranayake, has “no legal power or authority“.
“The Supreme Court determined that the PSC had no legal power or authority to make a finding of guilt or decision affecting rights of a judge since that is a power that has to be conferred by law and not standing orders of parliament”, a lawyer told reporters.
The judgement was delivered in response to a plaint filed by Bandaranayake in the Appeal Court seeking a quash order on the PSC findings, which ruled her guilty.
The parliamentary committee on December 8 ruled that Bandaranayake was guilty of three of the 14 charges in the impeachment proceedings against her moved by the ruling UPFA coalition legislators.
The three charges were financial impropriety based on non declaration of assets and conflict of interest in a case involving a failed investment company.
The 54-year-\—old chief justice denied all the charges against her. On December 6, she stormed out of the impeachment hearing in parliament, saying she will not be given a fair trial. The opposition had also boycotted the PSC, claiming the whole process a political witch hunt.
The impeachment which brewed over several months was the result of a tussle between the judiciary and the government.
The government claimed the Supreme Court was acting against it while the judiciary claimed its independence was being attacked by government.
The ruling, however, is certain to be ignored by the Parliament, analysts noted as it had at all times held that its powers were supreme and no court has jurisdiction over parliamentary action.