US President Trump recently called for the withdrawal of India’s high import tariffs, calling them unacceptable. He said India must give greater and ‘equitable’ access to US products in Indian markets. The question is whether India should heed his call.
In this connection it is important to know the theory of the German economist Friedrich List (1789-46 ) detailed in his book ‘The National System of Political Economy’.
List’s prescription
When he wrote this book Germany was not as industrially developed as England and France. List wrote that when England was doing its own early industrialisation it did so under heavy protectionism of its industries.
But when it had completed it and had become the most industrialised country in the world, it was preaching free trade and laissez faire to other countries, including Germany, which was then far less developed.
List said that without protectionism (in the form of high import tariffs) the relatively smaller and weaker German industries could not compete against the bigger English industries.
If a child is made to fight with a giant the latter will floor the former in no time.
The smaller and weaker German industries would be destroyed by competition with the English and French giants, unless protected by heavy import tariffs. Hence while ensuring internal free trade there should not be external free trade, until German industries are developed enough to withstand the competition of English and French industries.
Till then, if external free trade is permitted it will only result in subjugation of Germany by England and France.
List’s theory of ‘national economics’ differs from Adam Smith’s theory of ‘individual economics’.
List contrasted the economic behaviour of an individual with that of a nation.
An individual promotes only his personal interest, but a state fosters the interest of all its citizens. An individual may prosper from an activity which harms the nation.
Hence the state should prohibit such harmful activities of individuals, so that all its citizens may prosper.
At the same time, the national interest requires that if the domestic industries are weaker than those of foreign countries they must be given protection against destructive competition with the latter.
In my opinion India should follow the theory of List.
There was no doubt a certain limited degree of industrialisation in India after Independence, but we are still far behind North America, Europe, China and Japan.
Protecting industry
Our industries are still small compared to the industries of those nations, and if tariff duties are withdrawn, as Trump calls for, they may not be able to face the foreign competition and may collapse, leading to increased unemployment and other evils.
Already China has penetrated our markets. We will then be reduced to ‘hewers of wood and drawers of water’, as we were under the East India Company and British rule.
The Indian government therefore should take this into consideration.
The writer is a former Judge of the Supreme Court of India
Comments
Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.
We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of TheHindu Businessline and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.